Cases 61 - 70 of 357
Nellson v. Barnhart et al
as 1:2020cv00756
Defendant:
Warden J. Barnhart, United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. (I) Barnhart and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2020cv00760
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Plaintiff:
Darnell Pittman, Sr.
Interested Party:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Matevosian et al
as 1:2020cv00327
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison, Andre Matevosian, Humphries and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Tracy Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Njos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2019cv03686
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and B. True
Petitioner:
Scott J. Njos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bacon v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2019cv02642
Defendant:
Ruth Hackford, Bureau of Prisons, District of Utah and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bacon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dury v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2019cv02476
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Dury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Magluta v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2019cv02222
Plaintiff:
Salvador Magluta
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Holbrook, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2019cv02049
Defendant:
United States Penitentiary, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Derek J. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gravley v. Bureau of Prison et al
as 1:2019cv01655
Defendant:
Psychologist, Colorado Super Max Prison and Bureau of Prison
Plaintiff:
Dwaune J. Gravley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2019cv01411
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, R. Hudgins and Hugh Hurwitz
Plaintiff:
Kenneth F. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
