Cases 61 - 70 of 655
ABBOTT v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv02492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. ABBOTT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, SHELLEY POWER, LORETTA OTIS-SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIDDIQUI v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv02455
Plaintiff:
AAFIA SIDDIQUI
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
TURNER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv02440
Plaintiff:
ANTWONNE TURNER
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WHITE v. HILL et al
as 1:2021cv02348
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Defendant:
KATHY HILL, STACY BYRAM, DANIEL SPROUL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
AYASH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv02110
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AYASH
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
GOBO v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2021cv02031
Plaintiff:
MAKUSHA GOBO
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FCI BEAUMONT LOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAHN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv01995
Plaintiff:
KRIS HAHN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
STONE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv01947
Plaintiff:
JACOB LOGAN STONE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BROOKS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv01866
Plaintiff:
CLARK A. BROOKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACMAHON v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2021cv01771
Plaintiff:
SKYDANCE MACMAHON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
