Cases 1 - 10 of 39
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25562
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BURLESON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16435
Plaintiff:
CHASE BURLESON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10379
Plaintiff:
STACY GRANT BURLESON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18939
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS BURLESON, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67007
Plaintiff:
ERIK BURLESON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59939
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BURLESON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34688
Plaintiff:
TYSON BURLESON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16706
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BURLESON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHERMAN v. BURLESON et al
as 3:2021cv00537
Defendant:
JANE DOE, J D HOLLAND, CASTRO and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS SHERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURLESON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10594
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY DEAN BURLESON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
