Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Burwell v. USA
as 3:2021cv00441
Petitioner:
Gregory W. Burwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones et al v. Hackworth et al
as 2:2019cv00678
Plaintiff:
Tavon Preston, Alphonso Byrd, Tony Jones and others
Defendant:
David Hackworth, R. Myers and Martin A. Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roeder v. Burwell
as 1:2015cv01194
Plaintiff:
Lisa Roeder
Defendant:
Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00745
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Buwell v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00596
Petitioner:
Gregory W. Burwell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Burwell v. County of Fairfax, VA
as 1:2012cv00312
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Burwell, Jr.
Defendant:
County of Fairfax, VA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burwell-Rainey v. Social Security Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
as 3:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
Shirley D. Burwell-Rainey
Defendant:
Social Security Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burwell v. United States of America
as 3:2010cv00076
Petitioner:
Gregory W. Burwell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Milton et al v. Miss Burwell et al
as 1:2009cv01074
Plaintiff:
Edwin Milton, Rashad Fraierson and John Does on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Miss Burwell, Miss Fields, Miss White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burwell v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv03253
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Burwell
Defendant:
3M Business Products Sales, Inc., Bayer CorpScience, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
