Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Texas Farmers Insurance Company v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, et al
as 1:2023cv00808
Defendant:
Rheem Manufacturing Company, Rheem Sales Company, Inc., Backer-Springfield Donngguan Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Texas Farmers Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Davis v. Pickett et al
as 4:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
Jordan Davis
Defendant:
Dalton Blake Pickett, Pagie Pickett, Trevor Galley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
as 7:2020cv00211
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ramirez and Adan Ramirez
Defendant:
David Backer and Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Porras v. Allstate Texas Lloyds et al
as 3:2016cv00968
Plaintiff:
Juan Porras
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyds , Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and David Frank Backer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephenson v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 2:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Stephenson and John K Stephenson
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Caterpillar Inc., Sears Manufacturing Co. and Backer Heating Technologies, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Backer Calesco, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut and others
Not Classified By Court:
Joe Dodson Clayton and Richard Grainger
Defendant:
Stephenson Dirt Contracting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saldana v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 5:2015cv00045
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and David Backer
Plaintiff:
Raymundo Saldana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Backer v. DeBruyn et al
as 7:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
John Backer
Defendant:
Margret DeBruyn and DeBruyn Produce Co.
Counter_claimant:
DeBruyn Produce Co.
Counter_defendant:
John Backer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
