Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JOHNSON v. DALTON et al
as 2:2021cv03545
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
STEPHANIE DALTON, RICHARD HODGE, JANET SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bains v. Quay
as 3:2021cv00353
Petitioner:
Sukhjit Bains
Respondent:
Herman Quay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN v. MAY et al
as 2:2017cv04284
Plaintiff:
KYLIEFF BROWN
Defendant:
MAY, ABELLO, THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. RONEY et al
as 2:2016cv02786
Plaintiff:
RAHIEM ROBINSON
Defendant:
RONEY, ALBRIGHT, BARKSDALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAINES v. COMMONWEALTH OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv06982
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN X BAINES
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DONNELLY v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2012cv06391
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DONNELLY
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAINES v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2012cv05672
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN X BAINES
Respondent:
LOUIS S. FOLINO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PROCTOR v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv03878
Plaintiff:
SHARIF R. PROCTOR
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM MEDICAL STAFF EMPLOYEES, CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, BAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baines v. Hills
as 1:2008cv00471
Plaintiff:
Wayne Baines
Defendant:
Dawn Hills
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Baines v. Powell et al
as 1:2008cv00252
Plaintiff:
Wayne Baines
Defendant:
Elizabeth Powell and Marcia Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
