Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Morgan v. Baker Hughes Incorporated
as 4:2018mc02270
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Katherine K. Morgan
Movant:
Richard A. Bui
Booth Family Trust v. Baker Hughes Incorporated et al
as 4:2017cv01457
Plaintiff:
Booth Family Trust
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated , Martin S. Craighead , Gregory D. Brenneman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker Hughes Incorporated et al v. Production Tool Solution, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Baker Hughes Incorporated and Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Incorporated
Defendant:
Production Tool Solution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Ross v. Baker Hughes Incorporated
as 4:2016cv02859
Plaintiff:
Shanna Ross
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rapid Completions LLC v. Baker Hughes Incorporated et al
as 6:2016cv00286
Plaintiff:
Rapid Completions LLC
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated, Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Inc, Weatherford International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eicher v. Baker Hughes Incorporated
as 7:2016cv00072
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Richard Eicher
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lubrizol Specialty Products, Inc.
as 4:2015cv02915
Plaintiff:
Lubrizol Specialty Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Baker Hughes Incorporated v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2015cv02675
Plaintiff:
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
