Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Esquivel et al v. Countrywide Home Loans et al
as 2:2015cv00135
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Bank of America, N.A., CTC Real Estate Services and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Esquivel and Lori Esquivel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Manzano v. National Default Servicing et al
as 2:2015cv00074
Defendant:
Bank of America, National Association, NSM Recovery Services, Inc., National Default Servicing Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqeline Manzano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00852
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
McKissick v. Bank of America
as 2:2014cv00002
Defendant:
Bank of America
Plaintiff:
Erik McKissick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01754
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
213) 894-1301 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sager v. U.S. Government
as 2:2013cv00369
Defendant:
James Albanese, Victor J. Albanese, Area 51 and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret E. Sager, II
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00500
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00199
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
