Cases 71 - 80 of 98
Stokes et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. et al
as 2:2011cv00567
Plaintiff:
Celia Stokes and Matthew Hobson
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 3:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
Gene A. Miller
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duvall v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2011cv00046
Plaintiff:
Peggy D. Duvall
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Roberts v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv00277
Plaintiff:
Charles Roberts
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broyles et al v. Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. et al
as 3:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
William E. Broyles , Jr., Harold W. Martin and Lyda J. Martin
Defendant:
Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. , Bank of America Home Loans and Mortgage Electronic Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2010cv01360
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Howard
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2010cv01354
Plaintiff:
Derrick Howard and BIS Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Kimberly Haskins, Elouise Goodum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
