Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,835
De Medicis v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv13057
Plaintiff: David De Medicis
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation and Midfirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ALLCOCK v. VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP et al
as 1:2023cv13022
Plaintiff: SUSAN ALLCOCK
Defendant: VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP and VALLEY NATIONAL BANK doing business as VALLEY BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Zaafan v. Umpqua Bank
as 1:2023cv13029
Plaintiff: Bassam Zaafan
Defendant: Umpqua Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jacobs v. Ernst & Young Investment Advisers LLP et al
as 1:2023cv13021
Plaintiff: Mykle Jacobs
Defendant: Ernst & Young Investment Advisers LLP and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
White v. Valley National Bancorp
as 1:2023cv13027
Plaintiff: Bridgette White
Defendant: VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP d/b/a Valley Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bender v. Union Bank & Trust Company
as 1:2023cv12987
Plaintiff: Paul F. Bender
Defendant: Union Bank & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Marsh et al v. Cadence Bank
as 1:2023cv12974
Plaintiff: Cris Marsh and Taylor Marsh
Defendant: Cadence Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dinh v. Umpqua Bank
as 1:2023cv12992
Plaintiff: Nhu Dinh
Defendant: Umpqua Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Pratt v. Cadence Bank
as 1:2023cv12996
Plaintiff: Tammy Pratt
Defendant: Cadence Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Shettlesworth v. Umpqua Bank
as 1:2023cv12991
Plaintiff: Marc W Shettlesworth
Defendant: Umpqua Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?