Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Cirello v. Riedel et al
as 2:2022cv01830
Plaintiff:
Robert Guy Cirello
Defendant:
Matthew Scott Riedel, Jacqueline Gravatt, NLVPO2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Riggs v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riggs
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Barbara Cegavske, A.G. Aaron Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REINOEHL v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2022cv01974
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER REINOEHL
Defendant:
JOHN MERRILL, KATIE M. HOBBS, ALEJANDRO PADILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Hintze v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Jason Hintze
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Barbara Cegavske, Aaron Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neil Scott v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-16355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEIL SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Attorney General and BARBARA CEGAVSKE
Harris v. Sisolak et al
as 2:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
Steven Sisolak, Barbara Cegavske, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Garmong v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, et al
as 22-15869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY GARMONG
Defendant / Appellee:
TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, JOHN MARSHALL, BRIDGET CORNELL and others
Ammar Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al
as 22-15548
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, AARON FORD and others
Clervrain et al v. Ebert et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Emmanuel Benjoassaint, Kaity Borgella and others
Defendant:
Jhone Ebert, Charles Daniels, Ann Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kevin Kennedy v. Shelly Williams, et al
as 22-15465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN KENNEDY
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELLY WILLIAMS, BARBARA CEGAVSKE, WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
