Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Bush v. Wait et al
as 1:2009cv02001
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
Dan Wait and Jason Decker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Prince George's Cty.
as 1:2009cv02003
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
Prince George's Cty.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Glenridge IM/OFC
as 1:2009cv01963
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
Glenridge IM/OFC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Head of Agency for U.S Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2009cv01849
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
Head of Agency for U.S Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bush v. State Of Maryland et al
as 1:2009cv01848
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
State Of Maryland and Prince George's County Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Edgewood Management et al
as 1:2009cv01847
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
Ms. Hammonds, Edgewood Management and Queenstown Apts.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bush v. President/CFO/CEO for M&T Bank et al
as 1:2009cv01845
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
President/CFO/CEO for M&T Bank and President/CFO/CEO for M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bush v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv01846
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
Jack Johnson, Head of Agency for Department of Social Services for Prince George's County, Head of Agency for DORS-Dept. of Rehabilitation Svcs. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Davis et al
as 1:2009cv01850
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
Cynthia Davis, Annette Payne, Cindy Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. EdFund Int'l et al
as 1:2009cv01844
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
EdFund Int'l and Windham Professionals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
