Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 101 - 109 of 109
Johnson #132513 v. Rubitschun et al
as 2:2007cv00155
Plaintiff: Robert Lewis Johnson #132513
Defendant: John Rubitschun, Barbara Sampson, Miguel Berrios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell #390475 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2007cv00662
Petitioner: Kenneth Allen Russell #390475
Respondent: Patricia Caruso, James Atterberry, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gross v. McDonald et al
as 2:2007cv12117
Plaintiff: Torrey Gross
Defendant: John McDonald, Leo Bowman, Donna Pendergrass and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Smith #267009 v. Rubitschun et al
as 2:2007cv00076
Petitioner: Derrick Lee Smith #267009
Respondent: John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manns #282897 v. Sampson et al
as 1:2007cv00383
Plaintiff: James Ernest Manns #282897, Jr.
Defendant: Barbara Sampson, Stephen DeBoer and James Quinlan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Markham #145474 v. Granholm et al
as 1:2007cv00296
Plaintiff: Thaddeus Eugene Markham #251741
Defendant: Jennifer Granholm, Patricia Caruso, Ray Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagetta #117646 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2007cv00267
Plaintiff: Robert Michael Bagetta #117646
Defendant: Patricia L. Caruso, John S. Rubitschun, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bringard #094073 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2007cv00160
Plaintiff: Joseph V. Bringard #094073
Defendant: Patricia Caruso, John S. Rubitschun, James Atterberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagetta v. Caruso et al
as 2:2007cv10588
Plaintiff: Robert Bagetta
Defendant: Patricia Caruso, John Rubitschun, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?