Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes, et al
as 22-55496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINE SAWICKY
Defendant / Appellee:
TAO SYKES, Manuel Real Beneficiary, PERCY ANDERSON, PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ and others
Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes et al
as 2:2021cv09023
Plaintiff:
Christine Sawicky
Defendant:
Tao Sykes, Percy Anderson, Philip S. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Solomon v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 9:2019cv80971
Plaintiff:
Barbara Solomon
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Price et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 9:2019cv80152
Plaintiff:
Iris Cassett Marchand, Lioudmila Dyer, Jewell Price and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P. v. Cuomo
as 10-1929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P.
Defendant:
Stroock Strook & Levan LLP, 3 to 4 LLC, ARC Chinish RE LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew Cuomo, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Philip Politziner, Glennis Politziner and others
CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P. v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2010cv03801
Plaintiff:
CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P.
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 3 to 4 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Clarendon America Insurance Company v. Spalding Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00005
Plaintiff:
Clarendon America Insurance Company
Defendant:
Spalding Construction Company, Inc., Kathleen Bandiero, Jeffery L. Ranowel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
