Cases 1 - 10 of 654
IN RE: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb, et al
as 1:2024cv03094
Not Yet Classified:
Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust
Defendant:
Jeremiah Darnell Webb, Noah Sencer Robert Barclay, Malakai Levi Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Puchtler v. Barclays PLC et al
as 1:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
Michael Puchtler
Defendant:
Barclays PLC, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, James E. Staley and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jacobs v. Barclays Bank PLC
as 1:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jacobs
Defendant:
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Liu v. Heastie et al
as 1:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Lewis Y. Liu
Defendant:
Carl Heastie, William A. Barclay, Andrea Stewart-Cousins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Fellows et al v. Ciccone et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Michael Fellows and Jonathan Hadden
Defendant:
Madonna Louise Ciccone, Live Nation Worldwide, Inc., Live Nation MTours (USA), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
