Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Barlow v. Rose et al
as 3:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Keith Barlow
Defendant:
S. Rose, C/O Adams, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barlow Richards, LLP v. King et al
as 2:2020cv00921
Plaintiff:
Barlow Richards, LLP and Barlow Richards, LLP doing business as Clear Counsel Law Group
Defendant:
Madigan Army Medical Center, TriCare West, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00151
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas et al v. Barlow Douglas & Hall et al
as 2:2017cv00459
Defendant:
Brent Barlow, Barlow Douglas & Hall and Dave Hall
Plaintiff:
Las Vegas CPA Professionals, Astrid Lucas and Stephanie White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barlow-Hines v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
as 2:2016cv02462
Plaintiff:
Jessica M. Barlow-Hines
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Amistad Christiana Church v. City of Las Vegas et al
as 2:2015cv01413
Plaintiff:
Amistad Christiana Church, Joelda May and Joel H. Menchaca
Defendant:
Stavros Anthony, Rikki Y. Barlow, Bob Beers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Barlow v. Herman et al
as 2:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Randall Bruce Barlow
Defendant:
Donald Herman, Herman Family Trust, Silver Care, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
NOT USED
as 2:2011cv00666
Defendant:
AHMSI Default Services Inc, BNC Mortgage, Inc., LSI Title Company and others
Plaintiff:
William C. Barlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
