Cases 1 - 10 of 15
TUNSIL v. COMMON PLEAS COURT/PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv02050
Petitioner:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Respondent:
JUDGE BRIGHT, COMMON PLEAS COURT/PHILADELPHIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILSON et al v. DELBALSO et al
as 5:2019cv05205
Respondent:
TERESA DELBALSO, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHARPIRO and others
Petitioner:
LEROY A. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAFOND v. HOLTON et al
as 3:2015cv00305
Petitioner:
RAOUL LAFOND
Respondent:
WALTER C. HOLTON, JR., CLIFTON T. BARRETT and S. MILLION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAFOND v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2015cv00120
Petitioner:
RAOUL LAFOND
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CLIFTON THOMAS BARRETT, JOSE SANTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GRIGGS v. BANACH et al
as 5:2015cv00653
Petitioner:
BARRETT Q. GRIGGS
Respondent:
KELLY BANACH, DAVID HOWELLS and RONALD MANESCU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARRETT v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv01336
Petitioner:
ANGELO ANTHONY BARRETT
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JOHN WETZEL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (PENNSYLVANIA) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARRETT v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv04879
Petitioner:
ANGELO ANTHONY BARRETT
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JOHN WETZEL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (PENNSYLVANIA) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barrett v. Harlow
as 3:2013cv00653
Petitioner:
Colton Andrew Barrett
Respondent:
Michael Harlow and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARRETT v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv01592
Petitioner:
LEON IVOR BARRETT
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, THOMAS DECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barrett v. Ebbert
as 1:2011cv02367
Petitioner:
Michael Barrett
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
