Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brown v. Barrett et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Le'Derrick Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
William Barrett, Joshua Finkley, Kevin Jackson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dent v. Leadbetter et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Robert Dent
Defendant:
John Leadbetter, Randy Walker, C. Speth and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. MTC Corp. et al
as 3:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
John William Barrett
Defendant:
MTC Corp., Unknown Walker, Norris Hogans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Health Assurance Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01045
Plaintiff:
John William Barrett
Defendant:
Health Assurance Inc. , Carl Reddix , Carl Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Health Assurance Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
John William Barrett
Defendant:
Health Assurance Inc., Carl Reddix, Carl Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dockery et al v. Epps, et al
as 3:2013cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Dockery , David Thompson , Jeffrey Covington and others
Defendant:
Christopher Epps , Gloria Perry and Archie Longley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Barrett
as 3:2011cv00230
Plaintiff:
Timothy Terrell Hudson
Defendant:
Jason T. Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Caskey et al
as 4:2010cv00146
Plaintiff:
John William Barrett
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bart Grimes, GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Lawler et al
as 5:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
Samuel W. Barrett
Defendant:
Arthur Lawler, Ed Hargett, Unknown Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barrett v. Epps et al
as 3:2008cv00630
Plaintiff:
Charles Barrett
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Stephanie Jones and Jerry Skipper
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
