Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Barrett v. Workman, et al
as 12-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB BARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, DEBBIE MORTON, Deputy Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, CHAD BROWN, Case Worker, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and others
Barrett v. Lopez et al
as 1:2011cv01117
Plaintiff:
Jacob Henry Barrett
Defendant:
James Lopez, Andres Carrillo, Jerry Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Workman et al
as 6:2011cv00423
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Randy Workman, Debbie Morton, Chad Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maguire v. Taylor et al
as 2:2011cv00832
Plaintiff:
Brian Maguire
Defendant:
C. Taylor, Kerry Galetka, Lanell LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. Barrett et al
as 1:2010cv00165
Plaintiff:
Joe Guitterez Morales
Defendant:
James H Barrett, Corinne A Burke Miller, Eric J Heimann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Jones et al
as 6:2010cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Bobby Boone, Randall Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryner v. Barrett, et al
as 10-4077
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER SCOTT BRYNER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM BARRETT and DENISE LINDBERG
Barrett v. Orman, et al
as 10-7000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB BARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ORMAN, RANDALL WORKMAN, DEBBIE L. MORTON and others
Martinez v. Hogan et al
as 1:2009cv02794
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Martinez
Defendant:
Gilbert S. Hogan, Gilbert (I) S. Hogan, Adam Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Egelhoff, et al
as 09-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DOYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN F. EGELHOFF, Judge, Denver Dist. Ct., ROBERT L. MCGAHEY, JR., Judge, Denver Dist. Ct., BARRETT WEISZ, Reg. No. 27601, Head Chair, Public Defender and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.