Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Barrett v. Ballard et al
as 9:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barrett
Defendant:
D. Ballard, T. Trombley and S. Snomea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Hochui
as 9:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barrett
Defendant:
Kathy Hochui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barrett
Defendant:
The State of New York, Cathy Hogul, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Hochul
as 9:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barrett
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chirse v. Bosto et al
as 9:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Sgt. Wood, Sgt. Schutt, J. Barrett and others
Plaintiff:
Devante Chirse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson et al v. Maciol et al
as 9:2020cv00537
Defendant:
Lisa Zurek and Robert Maciol
Plaintiff:
Sarah Barrett, Nicole Williamson and Shannon Terrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Schenectady County Sheriff Department et al
as 9:2020cv00264
Defendant:
J. Dickerson, Schenectady County Sheriff Department, D. Dagostino and others
Plaintiff:
Dushawn Sean Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trapani v. Dagostino et al
as 9:2018cv00805
Defendant:
Daniel Lachanski, John Purdy, Christopher Guildo and others
Plaintiff:
Damian R. Trapani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Revels v. Correctional Medical Care, Inc. et al
as 9:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Crystal Revels
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Care, Inc. , CBH Medical, P.C. , Emre Umar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Boyer et al
as 9:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barrett
Defendant:
Kevin Boyer, Roxanne Reimer, Elisabeth Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
