Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Barrett v. Laney
as 6:2019cv01034
Respondent:
Garrett Laney
Petitioner:
Jacob Henry Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Taylor et al
as 2:2018cv00029
Defendant:
Barrett, Jane Doe, Sgt. Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Peters et al
as 6:2016cv01073
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Jimmy Coker, M. Davidson, Julie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nevins v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 2:2016cv01050
Petitioner:
Barrett Lee Nevins
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Corizon Medical Health Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00971
Defendant:
Stephanie Alvarez, Corizon Medical Health Services, Inc., Jane Doe No. 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Henry Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2014cv01204
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
John Kitzhaber, Oregon Department of Corrections, Collette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Williams et al
as 6:2011cv06358
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Michelle Whitney Dodson, Jane Doe, Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Orman et al
as 3:2008cv03120
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
David Orman, Marty Sirmons, Debbie L. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barrett v. Williams et al
as 1:2008cv00484
Petitioner:
Jacob Barrett
Respondent:
Max Williams and Marty Sirmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nevins v. Hill
as 6:2007cv00747
Petitioner:
Barrett Lee Nevins
Defendant:
Jean Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
