Cases 21 - 30 of 125
Leary v. Thaler et al
as 2:2013cv00219
Plaintiff:
Francis J Leary
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, NFN Glenn, NFN Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Parker et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ)
as 7:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nedro Gwen Parker and Frederick Deone Gooden
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, James D Anders, Charles Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Wathen et al
as 1:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Quentin Morgan
Defendant:
Richard Wathen, Gregory David, Daniel Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Wathen et al
as 1:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Washington
Defendant:
Richard Wathen, Gregory David, Daniel Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayberry v. Anderson et al
as 1:2012cv00152
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dwayne Mayberry
Defendant:
Larry Anderson, Gary Johnson, Frank Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrow v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv01801
Plaintiff:
Micheal Wayne Barrow
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barrow v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01786
Plaintiff:
Janet Barrow
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Adams et al
as 2:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Murphy
Defendant:
John Adams, Larry E Berger, Tosha James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angel v. Hoke et al
as 7:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Harvey Angel, Jr
Defendant:
Frank Hoke, Vickie Barrow, Regan Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
