Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mannix v. Maram et al
as 1:2010cv03849
Plaintiff:
Sheila Mannix
Defendant:
Barry S. Maram, Daniel Sheetz, John #1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Carter v. Carter et al
as 3:2009cv03299
Plaintiff:
William Dale Carter
Defendant:
Patricia Bizaillion Carter, Pamela Hammer Schwartz, Gerald Timmerwilke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Clem et al
as 2:2009cv02230
Plaintiff:
Jack E Davis
Defendant:
Harry E Clem, Richard M Joy, Joan Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Wright-Gray
as 1:2009cv04414
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Wright-Gray
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, Barry S Maram and Barry S Maram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Equip for Equality, Inc. v. Maram et al
as 1:2009cv03931
Plaintiff:
Equip for Equality, Inc.
Defendant:
Barry S. Maram, Carol L. Adams and Charles D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
