Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Quinones v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09486
Plaintiff:
Richard Quinones
Defendant:
City of New York, Daniel Halligan, Stephen Bartels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rubenstein et al v. Travelzoo Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04396
Plaintiff:
Mark Rubenstein and Dennis J. Donoghue
Defendant:
Ralph Bartel, The Ralph Bartel 2005 Trust and Azurro Capital, Inc.
Nominal Defendant:
Travelzoo Inc. and Travelzoo
Glover et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv10261
Plaintiff:
Robert Glover, Jerome Givens, Cynthia Corona and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Friedman v. Bartell et al
as 1:2022cv07630
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Friedman
Defendant:
Dr. Abraham Bartell and United Jewish Federation of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Neill v. Noble Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv03432
Plaintiff:
Shannon O'Neill
Defendant:
Noble Corporation, Robert W Eifler, Paul Aronzon and others
Kent v. Noble Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv03257
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Noble Corporation, Charles M. Sledge, Paul Aronzon and others
Elliot v. Noble Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv03230
Plaintiff:
David Elliot
Defendant:
Noble Corporation, Charles M. Sledge, Paul Aronzon and others
Le v. Noble Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Phuong Le
Defendant:
Noble Corporation, Robert W Eifler, Patrick J Bartels Jr. and others
Hill v. Hessel et al
as 1:2021cv00838
Plaintiff:
Desean Hill
Defendant:
Sgt. D. Hessel, C.O. Bartel, C.O. Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prescott v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv06391
Defendant:
Ryan Hoey, The City of New York, Officer Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Prescott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
