Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Whitfield v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03872
Plaintiff:
Bart Whitfield
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leonardi v. City of Ashtabula et al
as 1:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Administrator J. Bart Leonardi and J. Bart Leonardi
Defendant:
City of Ashtabula, Chief of Police Robert Stell, Daniel Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Opaskar v. 33' 1987 Chris-Craft Amerosport Motor Vessel
as 1:2021cv02396
Plaintiff:
Gail Opaskar
Respondent:
33' 1987 Chris-Craft Amerosport Motor Vessel
Defendant:
The Third Lady and South Shore Lake Erie Assets & Operations, LLC. doing business as South Shore Marine
Interested Party:
James Bart Leonardi and Candida Lynn Kedas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Watts v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04490
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bart Joseph Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leonardi v. Mattel, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00138
Plaintiff:
James Bart Leonardi
Defendant:
Mattel, Inc. and Fisher-Price, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rippl v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2016mc00029
Petitioner:
Bart H. Rippl
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, David W. Ross and John Doe
United States of America v. Rippl
as 1:2016cv01139
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bart H. Rippl
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Rippl v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2016mc00018
Petitioner:
Bart H. Rippl
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, David W. Ross and John Doe
Klayko et al v. Yaskowitz et al
as 1:2016cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jessica Klayko , Betsi Pittman , Sarah Bartes and others
Defendant:
Edward Yaskowitz , Wingit, LLC and ECY, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
