Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Battle v. Panarese
as 1:2024cv04597
Plaintiff:
Toy Thomas Battle
Defendant:
Donald Panarese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Battle v. Hood
as 1:2024cv04622
Plaintiff:
Toy Thomas Battle
Defendant:
Michael James Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Berger v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Christian Berger
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Vernon Dewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. LOreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06346
Plaintiff:
Tina Battle
Defendant:
LOreal USA, Inc., LOreal USA Products, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Battles v. L Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12830
Plaintiff:
Mindy Battles
Defendant:
L Oreal USA, Inc., L Oreal USA Products, Inc., Dabur International Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Battles v. Revlon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11925
Plaintiff:
Sherena Battles
Defendant:
Revlon Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Battle v. Loreal USA, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv06702
Plaintiff:
Delilah Battle
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc, LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen-Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clendenny v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03235
Plaintiff:
Larry Clendenny
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Vernon Dewitt, Sherry Simmins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gilmore v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv02135
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gilmore
Defendant:
C/O Johnson, C/O Battle, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
