Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Patterson v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al
as 4:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Patterson
Defendant:
FNU Matsui, FNU Alexander and San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keaton v. Bay Area Rapid Transit et al
as 3:2023cv02411
Plaintiff:
Sentaze Keaton
Defendant:
Bay Area Rapid Transit and P. Chehal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adjaye v. Cook et al
as 3:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
Austin Richard Adjaye
Defendant:
Kevin Cook, BART Police Department and Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cyrus Greene v. BART, et al
as 23-15241
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CYRUS GREENE
Defendant / Appellant:
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, PRABHDEEP CHEHAL and TEAUNDRE MATTHEWS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv09193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv07720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv06119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
as 4:2022cv03680
Plaintiff:
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
Defendant:
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15556
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Bay Area Rapid Transit et al
as 4:2022cv01466
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Bay Area Rapid Transit, Singh, Muniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
