Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CAD Engineering Resources Inc. v. Bayer et al
as 2:2019cv11385
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
John R Bayer and Flagship United, LLC
Plaintiff:
CAD Engineering Resources Inc.
Defendant:
Stanley Masakowski
Williams-Bayer Industries, Inc. v. Constellium Automotive USA LLC
as 2:2018cv13012
Plaintiff:
Williams-Bayer Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Constellium Automotive USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Mall at Lexington Green, LLC v. Bayer Properties, LLC
as 5:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
The Mall at Lexington Green, LLC
Defendant:
Bayer Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Scott et al
as 2:2013cv13105
Plaintiff:
FirstMerit Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Jason Scott , Daniel Bayer and Sanford J Aaron
McKinney v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00224
Plaintiff:
George McKinney, George McKinney, George McKinney and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Fuente Parnters, LLC et al v. Ibold, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00410
Plaintiff:
Fuente Parnters, LLC, Fuente Parnters, LLC, Ibold, LLC and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Bayer et al v. Ace American Insurance Company et al
as 3:2009cv01268
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company, Roger Raglin, Darlene Raglin and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Bayer and Bayer Necessities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Smith v. Bayer Corp Long Term, et al
as 06-6468
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TERRY SMITH
Defendant - Appellant:
BAYER CORPORATION LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and BAYER CORPORATION
Smith v. Bayer Corp Long Term, et al
as 06-6136
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TERRY SMITH
Defendant - Appellant:
BAYER CORPORATION LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and BAYER CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
