Cases 1 - 7 of 7
M., et al v. Beacon Health Options, et al
as 23-4112
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THEO M. and M. M.
Defendant / Appellant:
BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC. and CHEVRON CORPORATION MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PLAN
M., et al v. Beacon Health Options, et al
as 21-4041
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JACQUE M., AMANDA M. and RAYMOND M.
Defendant / Appellant:
BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC. and CHEVRON MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PLAN
Hood v. American Auto Care, et al
as 20-1157
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLIE BRITT, an individual, MATRIX WARRANTY SOLUTIONS, INC., a Nevada corporation, DBA Element Protection Plans, DAVID GLENWINKEL, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER HOOD and ALEXANDER HOOD, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated persons
Freier v. State of Colorado, et al
as 19-1347
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES 1-100, BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC., THE STATE OF COLORADO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSANDRA FREIER
Larson v. One Beacon Insurance
as 15-1426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS LARSON, in his capacity as Bankruptcy Trustee for the Estate of Cynthia Coreyn Tester-Lamar
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE BEACON INSURANCE
Anthony Davis v. Kansas State Board of Indigent, et al
as 09-3204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES, a municipal corporation, adjunct and political division of Kansas, CAROL J. BACON, JANE AND JOHN DOES and others
Davis v. Kansas State Board, et al
as 09-3005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES, a Municipal Corporation, Adjunct and Political Subdivision of Kansas, JOHN AND JANE DOES A-Z, Public Defenders/Administrators, individually and as employees to Kansas State Board of Indigents Defense Services, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Kansas, JESSICA R. KUHEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
