Cases 1 - 10 of 51
HARVEY et al v. BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. 401 (K) SAVINGS PLAN COMMITTEE et al
as 2:2023cv20376
Plaintiff:
PAUL HARVEY and LELA LAPLANTE
Defendant:
BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. 401 (K) SAVINGS PLAN COMMITTEE and LAURA CROSSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
PALMERI v. HARMON STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01682
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PALMERI
Defendant:
HARMON STORES, INC. and BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Munday v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
as 2:2022cv04567
Plaintiff:
Janice Munday
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
GFA ALABAMA, INC. v. BED BATH & BEYOND INC.
as 2:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
GFA ALABAMA, INC.
Defendant:
BED BATH & BEYOND INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USM, INC. v. BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.
as 2:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
USM, INC.
Defendant:
BED BATH & BEYOND,INC. and BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
TEKSYSTEMS, INC. v. BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.
as 2:2022cv07489
Plaintiff:
TEKsystems, Inc.
Defendant:
BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
IN RE BED BATH & BEYOND STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 2:2020cv08673
Defendant:
VIRGINIA P. RUESTERHOLZ, JOHNATHAN B. OSBORNE, HARRIET EDELMAN and others
Plaintiff:
OLUFEMI SALU
Consolidated Plaintiff:
KEVIN GROOMS and GREG MANTIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv17057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv17057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
