Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BEGLEY v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv03244
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
SHANNON M BEGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BEGLEY v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. BEGLEY
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BEGLEY v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2014cv05247
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BEGLEY
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BEGLEY v. MITCHELL
as 2:2013cv02047
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BEGLEY
Defendant:
CHARLES E. MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
BEGLEY v. NCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2013cv01138
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BEGLEY
Defendant:
NCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BEGLEY v. PENN CREDIT CORPORATION
as 2:2012cv05517
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BEGLEY
Defendant:
PENN CREDIT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
BEGLEY v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv05805
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BEGLEY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BEGLEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53536
Plaintiff:
PATRICK A. BEGLEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BEGLEY V. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL
as 2:2010cv04250
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BEGLEY
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, LP and COLLECTO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
