Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Begley v. Duffield Regional Jail Authority
as 7:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Ellic Travis R. Begley
Defendant:
Duffield Regional Jail Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddick v. Begley et al
as 7:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
Lt. R. Begley, Unit Manager Stacey Day and Warden Rick White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonds v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Durwin Evant Bonds, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Rick White, K. Almarade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Clarke, et al
as 7:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Director, Dept. of Corrections, Lisa Hernandez, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Sexton et al
as 7:2020cv00454
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
C/O Sexton, C/O B. M. Begley, C/O Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chand v. Kiser et al
as 7:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Ms. Murphy, C.O. Sexton, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
Vinnie Vincent Chand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Swiney et al
as 7:2020cv00144
Defendant:
Lt. Stanley, Sgt. Begley and Walter Swiney
Plaintiff:
Donnell Saquan Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Collins et al
as 7:2019cv00393
Defendant:
C/O B.M. Begley, Unknown C/O, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Thompson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00260
Defendant:
A. Duncan, C. Stanley, W. Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaCroix et al v. City of Portsmouth, Virginia
as 2:2013cv00533
Plaintiff:
Robert LaCroix , Neil Begley , Myles W. Bostic, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of Portsmouth, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
