Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jones v. Belk Stores of Mississippi, LLC
as 3:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Belk Stores of Mississippi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Gautier, Mississippi v. Belk Stores of Mississippi, LLC
as 1:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
City of Gautier, Mississippi
Defendant:
Belk Stores of Mississippi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Walker v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
Linda Walker
Defendant:
Belk, Inc., Belk Stores of Mississippi, LLC and John and Jane Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lowe v. Belk Department Stores, LP et al
as 1:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Mary Lowe
Defendant:
Belk Department Stores, LP Individually doing business as Belk, Inc., Belk Stores of Mississippi, LLC Individually doing business as Belk, Inc. and Belk, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwards v. Belk Department Stores, LP et al
as 2:2019cv00025
Plaintiff:
Frances Imogene Edwards and Randy Edwards
Defendant:
Belk Stores of Mississippi, LLC and Belk Department Stores, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00626
Plaintiff:
Eva E. Anderson
Defendant:
Belk, Inc. , Belk Stores of Mississippi, LLC , John Doe Persons A-M and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
