Cases 41 - 50 of 4,008
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lynch v. Matterport, Inc, et al.
as 24-188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN LYNCH
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTERPORT, INC, RJ PITTMAN, DAVE GAUSEBECK and others
United States v. Bell
as 24-5003
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEWAYNE BELL
America Aguilar et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
America Aguilar, Alexis Bell, Dina Ward and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Kelton v. Nordstrom
as 24-50002
Plaintiff:
Randall Kelton and Kara Bell
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Incorporated, doing business as Nordstrom Rack, Kelsie Fucci, Nathan Hecht and others
CA Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.
as 2:2024mc00004
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Defendant:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Not Yet Classified:
Environmental Defense Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company
as 2:2023cv03030
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Defendant:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Not Classified By Court:
Environmental Defense Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Jones
as 2:2023mc00425
Petitioner:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Respondent:
Seth Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Marine Taxonomic Services, Ltd.
as 2:2023mc00424
Respondent:
Marine Taxonomic Services, Ltd.
Petitioner:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
