Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Beltran v. Cheremonv et al
as 6:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Beltran
Defendant:
Alexandra Cheremonv and Drake Foust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beltran v. Salem Police Department
as 6:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Beltran
Defendant:
Salem Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nunez-Beltran v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01944
Petitioner:
Guillermo Nunez-Beltran
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beltran v. Marion County Sheriff Department
as 6:2023cv01912
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Beltran
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff Department, Deputy Frieze, Deputy Kevin Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beltran v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01888
Petitioner:
Anthony Joseph Beltran
Respondent:
Warden Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beltran v. Jaquez
as 3:2023cv00987
Petitioner:
Anthony Joseph Beltran
Respondent:
Warden Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00374
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beltran v. FedEx Freight, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01597
Plaintiff:
Jesus Torres Beltran Beltran and Jesus Daniel Torres Beltran
Defendant:
FedEx Freight, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Larry Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00614
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Beltran v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv00915
Defendant:
Mr. Antonson, Mrs. Besse, Mr. Brandon and others
Plaintiff:
George A. Beltran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
