Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Carmony v. California Department of Mental Health et al
as 1:2007cv01558
Plaintiff:
Harold E Carmony
Defendant:
Steven Mayberg, W. T. Voss, Ben McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanford D Jones v. Ben McClain et al
as 2:2007cv06212
Petitioner:
Sanford D Jones
Respondent:
Ben McClain, Leroy D Baca and Steve Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Mayberg, et al.
as 1:2007cv01207
Plaintiff:
Sanford D. Jones
Defendant:
Stephen Mayberg and Ben McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmony v. Mayberg, et al.
as 1:2007cv01176
Petitioner:
Harold E Carmony
Respondent:
Steven Mayberg, John D. Morales and Ben McClain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhoden v. Mayberg et al
as 1:2007cv01151
Plaintiff:
Lawtis Donald Rhoden
Defendant:
Stephen W. Mayberg , Ben McClain , George Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amadeo v. McClain et al
as 1:2007cv01072
Plaintiff:
Raymond Amadeo
Defendant:
Ben McClain, James Robinson and Gary Dieke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mayberg et al
as 1:2007cv00985
Plaintiff:
Fred Scott
Defendant:
Stephen Mayberg, Ben McClain, Gary Renzaglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mayberg et al
as 1:2007cv00913
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Smith
Defendant:
Stephen Mayberg, Ben McClain, Gary Renzaglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mayberg et al
as 1:2007cv00897
Plaintiff:
Henry C. Scott
Defendant:
Stephen Mayberg, Ben McClain, Gary Renzaglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBerry v. Mayberg et al
as 1:2007cv00850
Plaintiff:
Wayne P. DeBerry
Defendant:
Stephen Mayberg, Ben McClain, Gary Renzaglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
