Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Lopez v. General Motors, LLC
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Benito Lopez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lopez v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv14886
Plaintiff:
Benito Lopez
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lopez v. United States Of America
as 7:2021cv00256
Plaintiff:
Benito Lopez, III
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Benito Lopez-Yepez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72881
Petitioner:
BENITO LOPEZ-YEPEZ, AKA Benito Lopez, AKA Benito Yepez
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Lopez v. Sheriffs Department of Kern County
as 1:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Ruben Benito Lopez
Defendant:
Sheriffs Department of Kern County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Sheriffs Department of Kern County
as 5:2015cv05300
Plaintiff:
Ruben Benito Lopez
Defendant:
Sheriffs Department of Kern County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benito Lopez v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 5:2014cv00646
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Benito Lopez
Lopez v. Avital et al
as 1:2014cv01709
Defendant:
Shlomo Avital and Millennium Car Wash
Plaintiff:
Tomas Benito Lopez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Lopez et al v. A. NAPCO & SON INC et al
as 1:2014cv01710
Defendant:
A. NAPCO & SON INC and ANTHONY NAPOLITANO
Plaintiff:
Rudy Alexander Cruz and Tomas Benito Lopez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Lopez et al v. A. Napco & Son Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01710
Defendant:
A. Napco & Son Inc and Anthony Napolitano
Plaintiff:
Rudy Alexander Benito Cruz and Tomas Benito Lopez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
