Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Harper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Carl J Harper, Leon Guy Patterson, Sr, Wayne Earl Paul and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
RAJAK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv60198
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN CHARLES RAJAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03372
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN CHARLES HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOST v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92440
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN CHARLES YOST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benjamin Ackerman, Jr. v. USA
as 17-12767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN CHARLES ACKERMAN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Benjamin Boone
as 16-15899
Petitioner:
In re: BENJAMIN CHARLES BOONE
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ackerman v. United States of America
as 8:2014cv01407
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Charles Ackerman, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Benjamin Boone v. USA
as 14-11815
Petitioner - Appellant:
BENJAMIN CHARLES BOONE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Boone v. Samuels, et al
as 5:2012cv00580
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Charles Boone
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., FNU Martin, E. Carrero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BOONE v. SAMUELS, et al
as 5:2012cv00330
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN CHARLES BOONE
Defendant:
CHARLES E SAMUELS, JR, MARTIN, E CARRERO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
