Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Spears v. Alabama, State of et al
as 6:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Darrell Spears
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Nick Smith, Henry Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Walker County District Court et al
as 6:2019cv00617
Plaintiff:
Brian Darnell Casey, Sr
Defendant:
Sam Bently, Administrator Calloway, Walker County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gafford v. Dunn et al
as 7:2016cv01437
Plaintiff:
David Scott Gafford
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bently and Willie Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Thomas et al
as 7:2016cv01306
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ladale Wood
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, Debra Toney, Willie Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyde v. Thomas et al
as 7:2016cv01253
Plaintiff:
Joe Lenard Loyde
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, Debra Toney, Willie Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dent v. Thomas et al
as 7:2015cv02119
Plaintiff:
Robert Dell Dent
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, Debra Toney, Willie Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Hutton et al
as 7:2015cv02035
Plaintiff:
Travis Glenn Allen
Defendant:
John Hutton, Willie Thomas, Debra Toney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Tuscaloosa County et al
as 7:2014cv01622
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dewayne Booth
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County, Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court, Tuscaloosa County District Attorney Office and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumfield v. Bently et al
as 5:2014cv00365
Petitioner:
George A Brumfield
Respondent:
Robert Bently, Kim Thomas and Mark Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. Price et al
as 2:2014cv00232
Plaintiff:
Chalmus Wright
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas and Robert Bently
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
