Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berger v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01227
Plaintiff:
Mark Berger
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bryant v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 4:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
J.C. Bryant
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., Centurion, David Vandergriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Berger et al
as 4:2022cv00522
Petitioner:
Gregory S. Simpson
Respondent:
Commandant of the Ma General David H. Berger, Secretary of the Nav The Honorable Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of Defense The Honorable Lloyd J. Austin III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Feher et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00767
Plaintiff:
Patricia M. Byrd, Hope Colling, Angela Bomba and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., PTI Union, LLC d/b/a Pharma Tech Industries, PTI Royston, LLC d/b/a Pharma Tech Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berger v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01241
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Mark Berger
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Martin v. GM Financial et al
as 5:2018cv06116
Plaintiff:
Steven Albert Martin
Defendant:
Julie K. Graham, GM Financial, Missouri Department of Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berger v. Prudden
as 4:2018cv00586
Petitioner:
Michael Berger
Respondent:
Doug Prudden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raedeke v. Hanley et al
as 4:2018cv00319
Plaintiff:
Eric Raedeke
Defendant:
Jill Hanley and Patty Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berger v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Mark Berger
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
