Cases filed in New Mexico
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
United States of America v. $4,553.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 1:2012cv00562
Defendant: $4,553.00 in United States Currency
Claimant: Michael Lee , Jennifer Lee , Best Chinese Massage and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
G&G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC v. Westside Best, L.L.C.
as 1:2011cv00079
Plaintiff: G&G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant: Westside Best, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Westside Best, L.L.C.
as 1:2010cv00516
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Westside Best, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mambo v. Hannah Best & Associates, et al.
as 2:2008cv00200
Plaintiff: Peter Mambo
Defendant: Hannah Best & Associates, Hannah B Best, Law Offices of Michael E. Mozes, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Best Western International, Inc. v. Doe et al
as 1:2007mc00053
Plaintiff: Best Western International, Inc.
Defendant: John Doe, Jane Does I-X, John Does I-X and others
Counter Defendant: Nils Kindgren, Larry McRae, Roman Jaworowicz and others
Movant: Penasco Valley Telecommunications and Penasco Valley Telecommunications
Best Western International, Inc. v. Doe et al
as 6:2007mc00053
Plaintiff: Best Western International, Inc.
Defendant: John Doe, Jane Does I-X, John Does I-X and others
Counter Defendant: Nils Kindgren, Larry McRae, Roman Jaworowicz and others
Movant: Penasco Valley Telecommunications and Penasco Valley Telecommunications
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00928
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00078
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?