Social Security Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BEST v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL GAYLE BEST
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party: SSAOGCOMMS and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BEST v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00064
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL GAYLE BEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Best v. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv00398
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff: Bonnie Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Best v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00268
Plaintiff: Charlene J. Best
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Best v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00030
Plaintiff: Pamela G. Best
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Best v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00461
Plaintiff: Wanda Faye Best
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Best v. Colvin
as 5:2013cv00786
Plaintiff: Sheila Best
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Best v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00231
Plaintiff: Steven Guy Best
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Graham v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00624
Plaintiff: Clarether Best Graham
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BEST v. BARNHART
as 1:2007cv00067
Plaintiff: SYLVESTER BEST, JR.
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?