Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Norkunas v. Royal Plaza Marlborough
as 1:2009cv11317
Plaintiff:
Bill Norkunas
Defendant:
Royal Plaza Marlborough Limited Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Norkunas
as 1:2009cv11287
Plaintiff:
Bill Norkunas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Norkunas v. Harihar Hotel Realty Trust
as 1:2009cv11289
Plaintiff:
Bill Norkunas
Defendant:
Champak Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Norkunas v. Darling Development Corp
as 1:2009cv11290
Plaintiff:
Bill Norkunas
Defendant:
Darling Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Norkunas v. Felcor Suites Limited Partnership
as 1:2009cv11288
Plaintiff:
Bill Norkunas
Defendant:
Felcor Suites Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Muckle et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv10678
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Muckle
Defendant:
United States of America, George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rodrigo Zapelini et al v. Jane Doe, R.N. #1 et al
as 1:2009cv10332
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Zapelini and Sandra Condol
Defendant:
Jane Doe, R.N. #1, Paul Therrien, L.P.N., Sneh V. Dave, M.D and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Donaghey et al v. Buffalo Bills, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv10338
Plaintiff:
Barry Donaghey and Diane Donaghey
Defendant:
Buffalo Bills, Inc., The Apex Group, Inc. and Contemporary Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
