Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Driver v. Brahma et al
as 3:2023cv03426
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr.
Defendant:
Brahma and P. Yurovsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Driver v. Maya et al
as 2:2023cv01350
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr
Defendant:
Tereza Maya and M. A. Rauf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Driver v. Mueller et al
as 2:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr
Defendant:
Kimberly J. Mueller, Dale A Drozd and Psychiatrist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driver v. Avila
as 3:2023cv03119
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr.
Defendant:
Avila, et.al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billy Driver Jr. v. California Supreme Court
as 2:2023cv03858
Petitioner:
Billy Driver, Jr.
Respondent:
California Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Driver v. California Supreme Court
as 2:2023cv00883
Petitioner:
Billy Driver, Jr
Respondent:
California Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Driver v. Officer Clayton et al
as 3:2023cv02181
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Clayton, Officer Guevarra, Officer Cortina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Driver v. Rojas et al
as 2:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr
Defendant:
C. Rojas, J. Prudhel, S. Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Driver v. Grubb et al
as 2:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr
Defendant:
Grubb, Nathu and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Driver v. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2022cv02229
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service, Christina Brandon and Linda Stacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
