Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Maldonado et al v. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Ibarra, Matthew Dane Rinker, Billy Cambron and others
Defendant:
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc., Cobra Acquisitions, LLC, 5 Star Electric, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hale v. Livingston et al
as 7:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
Billy Frank Hale
Defendant:
Brad Livingston , Richard Wathen , Tommy Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Stephens et al
as 7:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Billy Frank Hale
Defendant:
William Stephens, John Doe, Tina Vitola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Stephens et al
as 4:2014cv01168
Plaintiff:
Billy Frank Hale
Defendant:
William Stephens, John Doe, Tina Vitola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Stephens
as 6:2013cv00293
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Billy Frank Lee
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios et al v. Turner Industries Group, LLC
as 1:2013cv00387
Plaintiff:
Manuel Alaniz Rios , All Plaintiffs , Eriberto Arana and others
Defendant:
Turner Industries Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Haynes et al v. Rubsamen et al
as 4:2007cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jeff Haynes and Winifred Wackman
Defendant:
Patricia Ann Rubsamen and Billy Frank Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hale v. Williams et al
as 7:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
Billy Frank Hale
Defendant:
Eddie C. Williams, Tommy Norwood, James D Anders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wackman et al v. Rubsamen et al
as 4:2007cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jessica Clark, Joseph Grady Clark, Jeff Haynes and others
Movant:
G. Ray Miller
Defendant:
Billy Frank Peters and Patricia Ann Rubsamen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
