Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Taylor v. Mitchem et al
as 7:2011cv00525
Petitioner:
Jemarcus Taylor
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Killingsworth v. Governor of the State of Alabama, The et al
as 5:2010cv03484
Plaintiff:
Terry L Killingsworth
Defendant:
Governor of the State of Alabama, The, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Billy Mitchem and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2010cv03283
Petitioner:
Anthony Sparks
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Douglas v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 5:2010cv03069
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Douglas
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, Billy Mitchem, Diane Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2010cv02629
Plaintiff:
Lester Carpenter Reed
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Jimmy D. Patrick, David Tully and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Partain v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2010cv02520
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Partain
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Galvez v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2010cv02156
Petitioner:
Santiago Galvez
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2010cv02080
Plaintiff:
Christian Ivan Green
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Jimmy Patrick, Earl Joyner and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Mitchem et al
as 2:2010cv02057
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Jimmy Patrick and Patrick Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElyea v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2010cv01819
Petitioner:
Tony Wayne McElyea
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
