Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Ramon Alvarado, Jr. v. Joseph Beahm, et al
as 24-1126
Plaintiff:
RAMON ALVARADO, JR.
Defendant:
JOSEPH BEAHM, JOHN BIRDYSHAW, BRIAN FOSTER, Warden and others
Green v. Pohl et al
as 1:2023cv01585
Plaintiff:
Cornelius A Green, Jr
Defendant:
Andrew Pohl and John Birdyshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Birdyshaw et al
as 2:2023cv01395
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
John Birdyshaw, Mathew Burns, Chad Geschke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvarado v. Alderman et al
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Officer Alderman, Joseph Beahm, John Birdyshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Beahm et al
as 2:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph Beahm, John Birdyshaw, Officer Felski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Beahm et al
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph Beahm, Alderman, John Birdyshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Birdyshaw et al
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
John Birdyshaw, Felske Hawkins, Cpt Kyle Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Benston et al
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Alderman, Sgt Joseph Beahm, Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Birdyshaw et al
as 2:2022cv01357
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
John Birdyshaw, Bretzel, Dingman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Alderman et al
as 2:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Officer Alderman, Joseph Beahm, Officer Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
