Cases 31 - 40 of 51
THORPE et al v. CROSS et al
as 1:2013mc00405
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THORPE and BLAIR HAMRICK
Defendant:
KEITH F. CROSS, JOSEPH F. BENNETT and CROSS & BENNETT L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
SIBLEY v. MACALUSO et al
as 1:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
JUDITH MACALUSO , ERIC T. WASHINGTON , JOHN R. FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIBLEY v. ALEXANDER et al
as 1:2012cv01984
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
YVETTE ALEXANDER , DONALD R. DINAN and WILLIAM P. LIGHTFOOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SIBLEY v. OBAMA
as 1:2012cv01832
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCGRAW v. BLACKINGTON et al
as 1:2012cv00618
Plaintiff:
OSCAR BLAIR MCGRAW
Defendant:
BRADLEY A. BLACKINGTON and JACK F. CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIBLEY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2012cv00001
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIBLEY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2011cv00919
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SIBLEY v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2010cv01696
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, JOHN G. ROBERTS, SAMUEL ANTHONY ALITO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIERRA CLUB et al v. SALAZAR et al
as 1:2010cv01513
Plaintiff:
SIERRA CLUB , OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION , FRIENDS OF BLAIR MOUNTAIN, INC. and others
Defendant:
KEN SALAZAR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, JON JARVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3373
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
