Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Wade v. Walker et al
as 1:2020cv00507
Defendant:
Thaddeus N. Walker, Jr., SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc. and Rooms to Go Alabama Corp.
Plaintiff:
Randal Blake Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teodor Marian v. Julian Castro, et al
as 17-56369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEODOR MARIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIAN CASTRO, Secretary HUD, NAN MCKAY, in his individual Capacity as Housing Inspector Employed by Sect. 8, CHRISTOPHER BECK, in his Individual Capacity as General Counsel for Sec. 8 Voucher Program of Ventura and others
Teodor Marian v. Julian Castro, et al
as 17-56369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEODOR MARIAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JULIAN CASTRO, Secretary HUD, NAN MCKAY, in his individual Capacity as Housing Inspector Employed by Sect. 8, CHRISTOPHER BECK, in his Individual Capacity as General Counsel for Sec. 8 Voucher Program of Ventura and others
Teodor Marian v. Nan McKay, et al
as 17-55551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEODOR MARIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NAN MCKAY, in his individual Capacity as Housing Inspector Employed by Sect. 8, BLAKE WADE, in his Individual Capacity as Chief Executive Officer at Sec. 8 Voucher Program of Ventura, CHRISTOPHER BECK, in his Individual Capacity as General Counsel for Sec. 8 Voucher Program of Ventura and others
Teodor Marian v. Nan McKay, et al
as 17-55551
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEODOR MARIAN
Defendant / Appellee:
NAN MCKAY, in his individual Capacity as Housing Inspector Employed by Sect. 8, BLAKE WADE, in his Individual Capacity as Chief Executive Officer at Sec. 8 Voucher Program of Ventura, CHRISTOPHER BECK, in his Individual Capacity as General Counsel for Sec. 8 Voucher Program of Ventura and others
Tucker v. Rudd et al
as 3:2017cv00673
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tucker
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Rudd, Rutherford County Jail, Rudd Medical Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
