Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01916
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
LOPEZ v. BLALOCK et al
as 1:2019cv01111
Defendant:
MELISSA BLALOCK and SCOTT S. HARRIS
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ and RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ doing business as STARLIGHT CONSULTING SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASEY v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2017cv02485
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Defendant:
SCOTT HARRIS and MELISSA BLALOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'ANGELO v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2015mc00181
Plaintiff:
CAMPANELLA D'ANGELO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., SCOTT HARRIS, JACOB C. TRAVERS and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
COBBLE v. BLALOCK
as 1:2014cv02177
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
MELISSA BLALOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE et al
as 1:2014cv00709
Plaintiff:
RICHARD COLEMAN
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, KENNETH MCHUGH, C.J. DALIARIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE et al
as 1:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
RICHARD COLEMAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, KENNETH MCHUGH, C.J. DALIARIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBBLE v. SUTER et al
as 1:2013cv01045
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER and MELISSA BLALOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv01526
Plaintiff:
GENE E. SMITH, SR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, JEFFREY ATKINS, M. BLALOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, et al
as 1:2008cv00737
Plaintiff:
GENE E. SMITH, SR.
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, JEFFREY ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
